This is due to the fact that at the time of consideration of the criminal case Dading decisions on administrative offences has not entered into force.
The constitutional court decided that the sentence Ildar Dadina for repeated violation of the rules of the meeting needs to be revised. This is due to the fact that at the time of consideration of the criminal case Dading decisions on administrative offences has not entered into force.
The dading condemned for what he three times within six months has violated the rules of holding mass events. He was sentenced to two and a half years in a penal colony.
The decision of the constitutional court, which was read by the Chairman Valery Zorkin indicated that criminal liability for repeated violation can occur only when the facts of violation of legally established by court decisions.
It is emphasized that the mere fact of repetition is not a basis for bringing criminal charges, you need to prove that socially dangerous act. The court also recommended that lawmakers amend the criminal charges.
The article 212.1 of the Criminal code about repeated violations at rallies, the court found unconstitutional. Thus he dismissed the complaint Dading, who asked to repeal this section.
Ildar Dading — the first Russian, who was convicted under the article about repeated violation of the rules of the meeting. This article appeared in 2014 and involves criminal liability, if the person at least three times attracted for an administrative violation.
© 2017, paradox. All rights reserved.