Lutsenko said that the case against Sytnik has not yet opened.
The Prosecutor General’s office on 16 November declared open war on NABOO, she brought the case, which involves the head of the Ministry Artem Sytnik. According to Yuriy Lutsenko, the head of the National anti-corruption Bureau told third parties the details of high-profile cases. He thereby violated a state secret and two articles of the Criminal code.
The dirt on rush published and a former adviser to the interior Minister Anton Geraschenko. Thus the attack on the head of NABOO went from two main centers of the Ukrainian authorities – the President (in the face of his godfather Yuri Lutsenko) and the “popular front” in the face of people Avakov.
Coincidentally, all this happened immediately after “the case of the Golden backpacks” and “platinum armored cars”, where the NEB has touched the vital interests of Poroshenko and Avakov.
The journalists found out that accused the head of NABOO.
What he was talking about Sytnik
In the summer of 2017 held a private meeting with the head of NABU Sytnyk with some representatives of the media. During a conversation Sytnik told about the Affairs Martynenko, Onishchenko, Kulik, seized $1.5 million of Yanukovych and some other secret details and personal data of defendants in certain cases.
Here are some excerpts from his conversations with journalists off-the-records.
The money Yanukovych
“What was done by $1.5 billion. Yanukovych is just a legal nonsense and chaos. And with all due respect, the Yanukovych government itself would never allow it. Now everything is understood. And the consequences – Ukraine may already this decision for a very long time…”
Voting on auditor NABOO
“I experienced Friday and Saturday, because we didn’t fully understand what the reaction would be. But with the letter of the IMF, taking into account the position, “seven”, Americans, Europeans, the chance to stand there. I think they are now, if you do not vote, they will return again to the idea of audit…”
Case Martynenko
“I Avakov called and said: “Listen, well, then let’s now Martynenko Hilton pick, load Like (Kashkin, the defendant in the case of Yanukovych. – Ed.) we have your favor according to Onishchenko”. That is enough to find the dude and ask: “have You been to criminal organizations Yanukovych?” – “How much are you paying?” – “$200”. – “Was”. No, it’s not as it seems. “And that was” How we were arrested in this case? What amount of property you Kukushkin, are directly related?” “Don’t have”. “Okay, then containing classified this matter.”
The case against rush was instituted on the appeal of Deputy Elena Masorini.
Previously, the Internet has published an audio recording where a man with a voice like the rush, telling reporters the details of some high-profile cases.
Excerpt from the talk of Sytnyk with journalists, published and people’s Deputy Anton Gerashchenko.
“No proceedings against the rush”
Prosecutor General Yury Lutsenko said at a briefing that a criminal case against the head of the National anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) Artem Sytnik not open, and while he was only suspected of possible involvement in the disclosure of classified data.
“No proceedings against the rush. Is, in fact, possible disclosure of secret documents, about what made a statement to the MP, and then a person that considers themselves victims. You’ve probably seen those films where the person similar to mister rush, read out before a number of journalists materials obtained in the course of court-sanctioned bugging of one woman,” said the Prosecutor.
“I was surprised at this, and the petty laughter of the journalists who responded to the “strawberry”. If you can prove that the document had the status of secrecy, if it is confirmed that it was done by official law enforcement body, of course, he would have problems with the law,” – said Lutsenko.
He also expressed concern about the aggravated confrontation between the main anti-corruption body in Ukraine.
The reaction from the camp Avakov
A former adviser to the interior Minister Anton Gerashchenko also actively involved in the fight against rush.
“If in the course of future investigations, it is confirmed that this record is really a Director of NABU disclose the materials of the pretrial investigation, constituting a state secret to unauthorized persons, it will mean that Sytnyk must be brought to criminal liability under articles 328, 365 and 387 of the Criminal code of Ukraine”, – wrote the people’s Deputy from “popular front” in Facebook.
Interestingly, Gerashchenko is known that discloses criminal cases right in Facebook, and making conclusions on them before the investigation is finished and will be tried.
Doing that all Ukrainian law enforcement agencies. And the state office of public Prosecutor and SBU to court traditionally publish separate resonant criminal cases, including the operational survey and documents, calling the guilty suspects in their social networks and official websites of agencies where these suspects can’t protect lawyers or the court.
The reaction of NABOO
A few days ago, he Sytnyk admitted the possibility of his arrest in connection with anti-corruption activities of his Department.
He said this after visiting the National Agency for prevention of corruption, where he was invited to present the Protocol of not providing them with certain documents as required by the NACP.
“We were expecting such a reaction, waiting for what will be the maximum media attack, with all the controlled resources such as NACP. So I will not exclude the further use of administrative resources, suspicions, arrests, including me personally,” said Sitnic on Monday.
Retaliation NABOO was a case of unjust enrichment of Yuri Lutsenko, the Prosecutor General of Ukraine. On Thursday announced the former Prosecutor of Yanukovych, lawyer Renat Kuzmin, who directly submitted the application to the NEB that Lutsenko did not specify in the Declaration part of the property of his family.
“If I’m not mistaken, this is the fifth or sixth criminal proceedings against me. Some are closed, some are being investigated … my wife and I don’t have to declare two Parking lots, which were acquired by my son, who is 28 years old and lives separately,” – responded by Lutsenko.
© 2017 – 2019, paradox. All rights reserved.
