International Court of Justice claims jurisdiction to hear Iran’s dispute against US sanctions

On Wednesday, a panel of 16 judges ruled that the International Court of Justice (ICJ), also known as the World Court, has jurisdiction in the dispute.

The case against the US was first brought to the ICJ in 2018 by Tehran, who accused Washington of breaching a 1955 friendship treaty between the two countries when the Trump administration imposed sanctions.

The sanctions were imposed after then-President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew the US from the Iran nuclear deal, accusing Tehran of having breached its commitments to the international agreement despite UN watchdogs saying the country was compliant. 

Washington has dismissed the lawsuit as “baseless” and vowed to fight against it.

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif welcomed the World Court’s update on Wednesday, hailing it as a “legal victory”.

“Iran has always fully respected int’l law. High time for the US to live up to 𝙞𝙩𝙨 int’l obligations,” he wrote in a tweet.

The Iranian government has said the sanctions have caused hardship and suffering and ruined millions of lives through their devastating impact on securing supplies, including medical provisions. In August, UN rights experts called for the sanctions to be lifted because “humanitarian exemptions [to them] are not working”.

Despite decades of hostility between the two nations, the friendship treaty was only terminated in October 2018 by then-US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo. The UN court noted in its summary judgment on Wednesday regarding US objections to Tehran’s case that the treaty was still in force when the complaint was filed.

DETAILS TO FOLLOW

© 2021, paradox. All rights reserved.