‘I do not celebrate or feel pride’: Twitter CEO defends Trump’s permaban, but admits speech crackdown can ‘destroy’ open internet

“I do not celebrate or feel pride in our having to ban @realDonaldTrump from Twitter,” Dorsey tweeted on Wednesday, adding that the decision to boot the president off the platform was still “the right” one.

He cited the “extraordinary and untenable circumstances” the social media giant had to consider when it moved to erase Trump’s presence from the platform, saying that the decision was made to protect “public safety.”

“Offline harm as a result of online speech is demonstrably real, and what drives our policy and enforcement above all,” he said.

Dorsey admitted, however, that this shows that the tech giants can mute voices at will if they deem them too dangerous. “Having to take these actions fragment the public conversation. They divide us. They limit the potential for clarification, redemption, and learning.”

Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Snapchat are among major social media platforms that have either taken down Trump’s account for good (Twitter and Snapchat), or suspended him for “inciting violence” in the run-up to the storming of the US Capitol on January 6 by a crowd of supporters.

Although he is the most high-profile victim of the crackdown, Trump is not the only conservative social media user to have been silenced in the last week. Hundreds of thousands of his supporters, including believers in the QAnon conspiracy theory, and other non-mainstream media accounts were booted from Facebook and Twitter. Once a conservative social media safe haven, Parler is also on the verge of extinction, with CEO John Matze saying on Wednesday that the company might never be back online after Amazon dropped it from its servers over a failure to swiftly remove “violent” content amid an influx of users.

Dorsey rejected the notion that there was a concerted effort by Big Tech, arguing that it was “more likely,” that “companies came to their own conclusions or were emboldened by the actions of others.”

He said that he would like to see Twitter’s moderation policy be more decentralized, comparing the future model to that of bitcoin – “not controlled or influenced by any single individual entity.” Dorsey added that those who disagree with Twitter’s current policy are free to leave the platform.

If folks do not agree with our rules and enforcement, they can simply go to another internet service.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

© 2021, paradox. All rights reserved.