A detailed analysis of the characteristics.
We have not done a comparison of the autonomy of Samsung Galaxy Note 8, iPhone X, OnePlus 5 and iPhone 8 Plus, and obviously not worth more this pull. All 4 devices were tested side by side in conditions close to real, at least, so says the one who ran the test. The author of the video put them on the table, before charging it to 100%, and started to run various applications, from social networking to games.
Key differences between our today’s heroes.
It should be emphasized that 8 Plus 5 and OnePlus have an advantage over the other two devices, as they have a lower physical resolution of 1920×1080 pixels. Phablet from the South Korean manufacturer uses a panel with a resolution of 2960×1440 pixels, which adversely affects performance, and therefore autonomy. iPhone X is equipped with a panel with a resolution of 2436×1125 points, which is also very much.
In addition, Note and OnePlus have the same battery of 3300 mAh, while the “tens” — 2716 mAh battery, and a Plus — 2691 mAh. The results were honest, in the IPhones was disabled the function of True Tone, and brightness were put on the same level on all four gadgets.
Comparison of autonomy
The test begins with the launch and operation of the mobile client instagram on the above-mentioned devices at the same time. Left is iPhone X, behind it stands the iPhone 8 Plus, then OnePlus 5 and finally, the Galaxy Note 8. After nearly 23 minutes of “ten” from Apple still had 100% charge while the battery level on the black fell to 95, for OnePlus to 96, and the Galaxy to be 93. Or the new iPhone X is very good optimization, any problems with the software, which incorrectly displays the remaining battery capacity.
For 20 minutes X iPhone lost 4% battery, the iPhone 8 Plus lost 11 percent, OnePlus 5 — 7 percent, but Note 8 more than the others — 13 percent. By the way, at this point, the phone played YouTube videos in same quality.
The next step, which should have a greater impact on the rate of discharge was the games Lite. Basically it loads the kernel of the graphics card, but the processor is partly used for data processing.
At around one hour and 18 minutes when the game was minimized on the screen of iPhone X display battery level 87%, another IPhone remained 76%, the flagship of the Chinese brand, we see 88%, and galaxy — 77%. The difference between the last and “ten” is quite significant, despite the differences in batteries.
Within 15 minutes of the game Super Mario Run all phones have substantially lost the charge. During this short period of time phablet from Samsung lost 9%, OnePlus only 7%, 8 Plus 10%, and X — 9%, which is also good. At around 1 hour and 58 minutes on all machines were running the full test benchmark AnTuTu, after which we get the following results:
iPhone X: 53%.
iPhone 8 Plus: 39%.
OnePlus 5: 58%.
Galaxy Note 8: 41%.
Note that iPhone X scored less points, and this means that it overheated and the CPU dropped the nominal clock speed to reduce heat. Almost the same bad result gives the Galaxy Note, he is in third place out of four.
Then the author opened the camera app in 12 minutes, leaving him just running. During this short period of time the 5.5-inch IPhone has lost as much as 6 per cent charge, while the rest of the phone is dead only 3 percent. After 55 minutes in the main map view in Google Maps all devices without exception, visibly exhausted. Compare the meter shows 40% in the smartphone Korean manufacturer remained 19%, iPhone 8 Plus 15%, and iPhone X — 36%, which is significantly more than Samsung or Plus.
The test results
For 25 minutes of continuous testing in Geekbench 4 Apple iPhone 8 Plus is deactivated because the battery is completely dead. After 10 minutes, then “died” Galaxy Note 8.
In General, the Plus 8 was in last place, lasting 4 hours and 26 minutes, in third place with a score of 4 hours and 35 minutes was the machine from Samsung, in second with a score of 5 hours and 2 minutes located 5.8-inch IPhone, and the winner is the OnePlus 5. He lasted as much as 5 hours and 15 minutes.
© 2017 – 2019, paradox. All rights reserved.