Monday , October 26 2020
Home / policy / “Why do the investigators — the mystery of the” TFR has appointed Michael Svetovou urological examination

“Why do the investigators — the mystery of the” TFR has appointed Michael Svetovou urological examination

«Зачем это следователям — загадка» СКР назначил Михаилу Светову урологическую экспертизу

Investigators ordered a urological examination to the member of the “Libertarian party” Michael Svetova, who is a witness in the case of indecent assault (article 135 of the criminal code). “This examination should show whether Michael [Lights] to have sexual intercourse or not. Why do the investigators, I don’t know. It is a mystery to all, given that the events referred to in the criminal case occurred seven years ago,” said lawyer Svetova Mikhail Biryukov.

Yesterday during questioning, investigators tried to find out when Michael Lights met his ex-girlfriend Anastasia, which even held a confrontation between young people. “The investigation came from the fact that Anastasia’s at the beginning of the relationship with the Light of 16 years. But in fact the relationship between them arose when Anastasia was 16 years old. Most Anastasia to Michael, no complaints, now they are in friendly relations,” — said Biryukov.

According to the lawyer Mikhail Svetov, the reason for initiation criminal proceedings on article 135 of the criminal code “Indecent assault” was the statement of representatives of the MIC “news”. “August 7, 2019, someone from the MITS “news” found on the Internet a photograph of [Mikhail Svetov in Instagram], then wrote the corresponding application in law enforcement bodies”, — said Mikhail Biryukov.


We will remind, yesterday in the apartment of Mikhail Svetov security forces conducted a search, during which seized a server. After that, the Lights came to the investigative Committee for questioning, which lasted about 12 hours.

The addition of 14:49 on 7 November 2019: to clarify a lawyer, in the resolution on initiation of the case in which Lights is a witness, there is no direct indication for the presence of statements from the representatives of “Izvestia”. The investigators refer to the fact that “proceedings” “identified the” user “of social networking Instagram (Instagram) and Twitter (Twitter)” who “on their pages (in social networks — Approx. ed.) < … > placed the information about the indecent assault against a person under 16 years of age…”.

© 2019, paradox. All rights reserved.

Check Also

Civil war

“Today we hold in our hands the future of independent Belarus. The country we will …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *