Music critic talked about the pros and cons of the organization of the contest in Kiev.
Well-known Russian journalist Arthur Gasparyan compared the level of preparation of contest in Kiev with others.
“All the talk of parochial is someone’s complexes. Don’t be so hard on yourself and beating yourself up to do. What immediately comes to the Eurovision, platform, rehearsal, the hall, training hall, transport, the press centre was well designed and fit into the usual trends of this contest. Another thing is that the devil is in the details: I know all the problems, discussions, and revelations that occur in Ukraine, is the other side of the issue, and I don’t want to get involved. But what happened at the exit – no matter what the cost – it turned out well,” says Gasparyan.
“For example, you have a relaxed visit “Eurodomino” at Khreshchatyk! Not in all countries it was so well arranged. Many do it very formally, but here one feels that put a creative concept. But the red carpet is not as well-suited: forgot that the red paths are not made for participants and for spectators, citizens who come and look at the stars. And in Kiev the red carpet so blocked that it is no one of his able to come,” said a Russian journalist.
“Another obvious problem – it is “Eurovision”, it is very small. It should start for anyone arriving in Kiev from the plane. Here’s a person landed at Borispol do not understand what “Eurovision”. And on the way to the city does not understand. Only when he reached downtown, he finds out about the contest. And in fact the whole town should be in advertising” – summed up Arthur Gasparyan.
© 2017, paradox. All rights reserved.
