During the capture of the Peninsula Russia 80% of the SBU has betrayed Ukraine and swore allegiance to the aggressor.
The Deputy Minister of the temporarily occupied territories and internally displaced persons of Ukraine Georgy Tuka said that although during the beginning of the Russian aggression in 2014, Ukraine was not able to keep the Crimea, but it’s worth fighting for.
Tuck recalled that during the capture of the Peninsula Russia 80% of the SBU has betrayed Ukraine and swore allegiance to the aggressor.
Where local authorities have betrayed, we have lost Ukraine. Where local authorities rebuffed — Ukraine we have saved. If Ukraine is rebuffed in the Crimea, the events could develop much worse than occurred as a result. If there immediately began an armed confrontation, we would have had to send APU to the Crimea, because the level of training and in terms of providing the Russian military had the advantage. If we had trouble, I am sure we would not have enough strength to withstand the impact in the East. Kharkiv, Dnipro, Zaporizhia — it’s all been, he said.
According to the Deputy Minister, if Ukraine is dragged into the conflict in Crimea, then we simply would not have enough forces on two fronts.
“In addition, Russia could start a full-fledged war, as the Peninsula in addition to “boots” was a huge number of legal Russian troops. In the case of action against the “regulars” we would have immediately received allegations that “Bandera junta went on Russian world” and we have received a response from the regular army,” added Tuck.
© 2017 – 2019, paradox. All rights reserved.
