According to the lawyer, Ukraine “should more clearly articulate” the accusations against Russia by the tragedy of the airliner flight MH17.
Unknown that were handed to militants in the Donbass launcher Buk SAM that shot down passenger liner MH17, had intended to use it to strengthen the air defense of the DNI/LC. This was in the Court of justice said the Russian side invited the British lawyer Samuel Wadsworth, and on the second day of arguments of the Russian Federation in the Hague does not recognize that the military machine was delivered from Russia.
“If the Donbass passed anti-missile system, which was used for the shooting down of flight MH17, I want to make several notes. The Ukrainian side said yesterday that if the Russian side know about specific people in Russia, which, for example, helped to move the installation of Buk into Ukraine and back into Russia after the tragedy of Boeing, and is directly involved in this, the Russian side is obliged to investigate and punish these people in accordance with the various provisions of the Convention. However sounded on Monday the statement of the Ukrainian side was that the plane was shot down by the Russian party, and that the reformulation has caused our reaction on Tuesday,” he explained.
According to Wordsworth, in accordance with article 2 of the relevant Convention Ukraine “should more clearly articulate” what it accuses Russia.
“Whoever gave this complex the armed forces DNI/LC, he had only intended strengthening of defence of the DNI/LC from possible attacks of the Air forces of Ukraine”, – said the speaker of the Russian Federation, adding that the accusation of the Ukrainian part of the alleged missing information about what was the “intent” regarding the use of Beech.
In addition, Wordsworth noted that Ukraine for two days their statements in court allegedly “did not lead to any fundamental evidence” of what Russia sends weapons to the rebels in the East of the country.
© 2017, paradox. All rights reserved.
