IT lives up to expectations (REVIEW)

Go and compare. Here is the Stephen king of the smoker. And this is Stephen king a healthy person. Compared to “It” Andres (Andy, as he is called in Hollywood and as stated in the credits of the film), Mosketti prior big screen adaptation (okay, “explanation”) of the works of the king “the Dark tower” – it looks ridiculous misunderstanding what really is. And this is the first conclusion that can be drawn after watching both films.

In contrast to the “TB” to “It” – at least of the claims. There are no extra, not playing for the plot, no roles, the characters are all actors in his place, and there is no logical gaps or incompleteness. The makeup and special effects at the highest level, the monster (monsters, because It is diverse) is gorgeous, the characters live, the story is touching, scaring the audience a lot, and often very active.

Skarsgard in the role Pennywise beautiful.

“It” is a good, very good movie. This is a very good, almost exemplary adaptation. And this is the absolute hit, and maybe (quite likely) even a superhit. When the monstrous minimum of advertising in the foyer of our provincial Adler theater (actually just a few flyers, while other releases were advertised with large booths, large and small posters) evening sessions were held with the full house and the audience watched the film with pleasure, laughing at funny moments, frightened at the terrible and two or three times applauding seen. “It” almost perfectly.

But 5 out of 5 the film, I will not put. Not because of pity, but because it was still in the perfection, the elegance, some micro-defects. And they touched Holy for our horroroso brother moment – frightening scenes.

All the child actors played the five points. Someone’s six!

The frightening scenes were very many. More than the trailers (for the advertising campaign “It” was as balanced as the movie itself). Brighter than any promo. Bloody including. Frankly, I did not expect, we will show how the small baby hand – showed, Yes.

Among those scenes were great, like the local “prograding” scene with an album of old photos. But…

But for the most part it was still the usual screamers. Perfect shot, perfect, but it is predictable in 90 percent of cases. To the level of staging such episodes, what we saw at the famed James Wang, his colleague, Mosketti (Musette or Muschietti, as his name sometimes we transkribiert) still does not hold, and therefore really SCARES “It” is not so often. Skate Andres Andy, that was clear even on the “Mom” vibe and picture, but as a master of inventing something fresh, surprise-he’s scary to compete with the van still not able, though very trying. But, maybe it’s not always necessary?..

The sellers of red balls can now be millionaires.

In the end we got a great horror movie with a competent script, excellent atmosphere, sense, vivid characters, funny dialogue, beautiful monster, respect to the source (“We FLY”, and not “you, too, carry”). But we want more – and we promise to give more in the inevitable second part.

Copyright © 2009 – 2017 Horrorzone.ru

© 2017 – 2019, paradox. All rights reserved.