Moscow denies any involvement and expresses the need to prove that the CBO put it is to attack the liner.
Russia said in the Hague about the need to have evidence with what intent was provided to the separatists Buk.
The international court of justice in the Hague on 6 March began hearings on the suit of Ukraine.
The Russian side invited the lawyer Samuel Wordsworth, who argues that Ukraine has no grounds for accusations of Russia in the plane crash of MH-17.
His position is based on the fact that it is not known whether providers Buka intent to force down civilian aircraft. The lawyer said that ukraisnkaya side has not provided evidence that the Buk was delivered to Donbas with the aim of an attack on a civilian aircraft.
Wordsworth has podcherknul that, based on media reports, the separatists planned to only shoot down Ukrainian military aircraft.
“Must be a realization that Beech supplied for attacks on civilian aircraft. But Ukraine argues only that he was delivered from Russia, and nothing more”, – explained the lawyer.
He also denies that the Buk was brought to Donbas from the Russian territory.
In addition, Rossini the representative, Ilya Rogachev, said that at the time of the fall of Boeing in the Donbass were no less than 17 complexes Buk-M1.
© 2017, paradox. All rights reserved.
