2012 European champion hurdler Rhys Williams and Gareth Warburton, a multiple medalist at middle distance, were both found to have breached doping laws in 2014 when the black market steroid Dienedione showed up in their systems.
Later, however, they were permitted to arrange private testing of the supplements they protested had been contaminated, with the subsequent findings showing that they were “clean and contamination-free at source.”
According to a wide-ranging Mail on Sunday report, UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) allowed supplement salesman Darren Foote to have the products tested in a lab recommended by them without any oversight from the authority.
That testing, in September 2014, showed signs of contamination – but the report has revealed that the firm who manufactured the range had carried out later tests, showing that the batch the case centered on was not contaminated when it left their production base.
The news has rocked British athletics and put UKAD under even more pressure, following a story last week that the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has launched a probe into British Cycling being allowed to conduct their own drugs investigation in an unauthorized lab, including private urine testing.
Luis Horta, an ex-WADA lab boss, was particularly critical of the scandal. “In my opinion, the evidence is only valid if the chain of custody of the supplements is established,” he said. “It is crucial and can be perverted.
“If one person is in charge of the production or sale or the commercialization of the nutritional product, that’s not the right person to request the analysis of the products or send the products to the laboratory because he has a conflict of interest in the case.”
When asked by the Mail whether a re-investigation would be opened due to the findings, a UKAD spokesman said: “Whenever anyone has evidence that could be of interest about a potential anti-doping rule violation, then UKAD would always encourage them to provide that to us.”
Many readers took to social media to question the body’s conduct. “Again, a great doping story by [the Mail],” remarked one.
“Question: How big is this problem? There are numerous cases in which athletes have successfully argued with contamination of legal products.
“Can the chain of evidence always be manipulated so easily by athletes? What control do national anti-doping authorities exercise?”
“UKAD are awesome,” quipped another sarcastically. “Dope with impunity and if you get caught, blame the cereal you had for breakfast.”
This latest egg on the face of the authority and British sports follows the shocking expose of cycling’s ‘dodgy doctor’ Richard Freeman.
© 2021, paradox. All rights reserved.
